Socio-economic status of Rohingya refugees in Delhi
Author(s): Deepak, Aayushi Choudhary and Sushil Devi
Abstract: The global refugee crisis has emerged as a critical challenge, testing international cooperation and compelling societies to address their shared responsibilities toward displaced populations. According to the UNHCR, as of 2022, over 108.4 million people were forcibly displaced due to persecution, conflict, and human rights violations. Among these, the Rohingya crisis stands out as one of the most pressing humanitarian concerns. The Rohingya, a stateless Muslim minority from Myanmar, have been subjected to systematic violence, forcing them to seek refuge in neighbouring countries such as Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, and Thailand. However, their displacement has not guaranteed security, as they continue to face socio-economic marginalization, lack of legal recognition, and the constant threat of deportation. In India, approximately 40,000 Rohingya refugees reside in various cities, with many living in informal settlements under precarious conditions. In Delhi, Rohingya families struggle with poverty, limited employment opportunities, and restricted access to education, despite aid from NGOs and the UNHCR. While some manage to earn modest incomes, their financial vulnerability persists, exacerbating their hardships. The study highlights the need for sustained humanitarian support, comprehensive policies for socio-economic integration, and international advocacy to ensure their safety and dignity. Addressing these challenges requires multi-stakeholder engagement, emphasizing education, employment, and access to essential resources. The Rohingya crisis underscores the urgency for durable solutions, emphasizing both immediate relief efforts and long-term strategies to secure their future.
Pages: 43-51 | Views: 58 | Downloads: 36Download Full Article: Click Here
How to cite this article:
Deepak, Aayushi Choudhary, Sushil Devi. Socio-economic status of Rohingya refugees in Delhi. Int J Geogr Geol Environ 2025;7(2):43-51.